Science Paradigms: Positivism, Rationalism, Empiricism, Criticism, and Constructivism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/bibliotheca.v2i1.57Keywords:
positivism, rationalism, empiricism, critical philosophyAbstract
Paradigms in the philosophy of science play a crucial role in shaping perspectives on the nature of knowledge, the sources of truth, and the methods for acquiring scientific understanding. This study examines five major paradigms in the philosophy of science—positivism, rationalism, empiricism, critical philosophy (criticism), and constructivism—with the aim of understanding their fundamental differences and points of convergence. Positivism emphasizes objective empirical observation; rationalism highlights the role of reason in shaping knowledge; while empiricism regards sensory experience as the primary source of knowledge. Critical philosophy, as a synthesis of rationalism and empiricism, asserts that knowledge results from the combination of reason and experience. Meanwhile, constructivism views knowledge as an active construction by individuals within a social and subjective experiential context. This study shows that understanding these various paradigms is essential for developing a holistic and critical scientific framework.
References
Adnan, Irfan Maulana, dan Fikri Fathul Aziz. “Sejarah Pemikiran Muhammad Abduh dan Kontribusinya dalam Pendidikan Islam.” Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi PendidikaN12, no. 2 (2025): 67–78.
Ansharullah. Pengantar Filsafat. 1 ed. Barito : LPKU, 2019.
Arjuna, Klawing, dan Supriyanto Supriyanto. “Hegemomoni Epistemologi Post-Modernisme Filsafat Ilmu Terhadap Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.” Journal Education And Islamic Studies1, no. 1 (2023): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55062//JEDIES.2023.v1i1.159/5.
Burhanuddin, Nunu. Filsafat Ilmu. Edisi Pertama. PRENADAMEDIA GROUP, 2018.
Fajarni, Suci. “Teori Kritis Mazhab Frankfurt: Varian Pemikiran 3 (Tiga) Generasi Serta Kritik Terhadap Positivisme, Sosiologi, Dan Masyarakat Modern.” Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin24,no. 1 (2022): 72–95.
Rhaysya Admmi, dan Siti Fatimah. “Positivisme: Konsep, Perkembangan, Dan Implementasi Dalam Kajian Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Hukum.” Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan4, no. 4 (2024): 524–32. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v4i4.3831.
Maulana, Zidan Abid. “Konsep Filsafat Positivisme Perspektif Auguste Comte.” Jurnal El-Hamra: Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan7, no. 3 (2022): 31–40.
Maulidi, Ahmad Riyadh. “Positivism Philosophy And Science: Their Role On Education In Indonesia.” Jurnal Yaqzhan08, no. 01 (2022): 37–50.
Nainggolan, Rahmat Valent, dan Hery Budi Yosef. “Pengaruh Filsafat Positivisme terhadap Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern: Perspektif Epistemologis dan Implikasi Teologis.”
Ritornera -Jurnal Teologi Pentakosta Indonesia3, no. 3 (2024): 139–49. https://doi.org/10.54403/rjtpi.v3i3.72.
Oktavia, Yelvi, Azmi Fitrisia, dan Siti Fatimah. “Rekontruktif: Kritik Terhadap Positivisme dalam Filsafat Ilmu dan Relevansinya untuk Perkembangan Studi Administrasi Publik.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia7, no. 2 (2024): 248–55. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i2.77105.
Salsabila Rizma dan Eva Dewi. “Epistemologi : Rasionalisme, Empirisme, Kritisisme, Pragmatisme Positivisme dan Positivisme Logis.” Sinar Dunia: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Ilmu Pendidikan3, no. 1(2024): 144–54. https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v3i1.1799.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maspuroh Maspuroh, Moch Fadhil Alamsyah, Shaira Salsabila NS, Siti Hopipah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
